Attempts at Waiver of Liability:

Question: Can a contract waive Ontario consumer rights under the Consumer Protection Act, 2002 if I was sold poor-quality goods or services?

Answer: In Ontario, the Consumer Protection Act, 2002 generally can’t be contracted out of in a consumer agreement, because section 7 preserves the substantive and procedural rights given by the Act despite any waiver to the contrary   The quality promise in section 9 deems suppliers to warrant that consumer services are of reasonably acceptable quality, and implied conditions and warranties for goods also continue to apply, so terms that try to negate or vary those implied warranties are void   If you’re dealing with a poor-quality purchase and a “no liability” clause is being used against you, a paralegal at PKM Legal Services can help you assess whether the waiver is unenforceable and what practical next steps to take, call (519) 410-5250 for guidance.

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources

The Interplay of Various Sections of the Consumer Protection Act, 2002

In Ontario, businesses dealings between a business and a consumer are governed by, among other laws, the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, Chapter 30, Schedule A, which contains strict mandates regarding the quality standards in goods and services provided to consumers.  The statutory frameworks include mandates used to ensure that businesses are unable to circumvent quality standards, among other responsibilities, through the use of liability waivers or similar contractual terms.

Note: Please contact PKM Legal Services by phone at: (519) 410-5250 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.

The Law

Within business-to-consumer dealings, like other matters of commerce, the parties to a transaction are relatively free to negotiate the terms and conditions that will form the contract between the parties; however, even in the absence of any reference to the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, the terms and conditions therein, apply.  Among the terms and conditions within the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, are provisions addressing quality of goods and services as well as the inability of the parties to enter into agreements that waive the mandates within the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, including quality mandates.  Specifically, the respective sections of the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, state:

Herein, the significance of section 7 and section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, are examined to highlight how consumer rights are preserved in the face of potential breaches.

Consumer Protection Provisions

The Consumer Protection Act, 2002, is a cornerstone legislation for protecting consumer interests, mandating that all consumer agreements include implied conditions and warranties concerning the quality of goods and services.  The quality mandate within section 9 sets the benchmark by requiring that goods and services be of acceptable quality, fit for the intended purpose, and durable for a reasonable period given the nature and cost; however, to ensure these provisions hold, section 7 explicitly invalidates any waiver of rights or benefits conferred under the Consumer Protection Act, 2002.  This dual approach guarantees that consumers can trust in the quality assurances made to them without fear of businesses retracting those commitments through contractual loopholes.

Liability Waivers

Although the Consumer Protection Act, 2002 establishes robust consumer safeguards, some businesses may attempt to include liability waiver clauses with contract agreements for the purpose of limiting responsibility for breaches of quality standards.  A liability waiver, or similar clause within a business-to-consumer agreement raises various concerns including:

• The Issue of Enforceability:
  The attempt to use a liability waiver aiming to limit liability for failing to meet the quality benchmarks under section 9 are deemed void and unenforceable due to section 7, which prohibits waivers of rights or benefits provided under the Consumer Protection Act, 2002.
• The Public Policy Implications:
  The attempt to use waiver clauses to bypass quality standards undermines the public policy objective of the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, which is designed designed to assure consumers of minimum standards for goods and services.
• The Judicial Interpretations:
  The courts consistently emphasize that businesses must adhere to the statutory protections outlined in the Consumer Protection Act, 2002 and are unable to rely upon contract terms to avoid the statutory obligations.

When businesses attempt to include liability waivers within contracts, courts have rigorously enforced section 7, invalidating any terms that conflict with the statutory protections.  This adherence to section 7 ensures that the protection mechanism maintains the legislative intent to prioritize consumer interests over commercial expediency.

Conclusion

The interplay between section 7 and section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, safeguards essential consumer rights against the misuse of liability waivers.  By understanding and respecting these statutory protections, businesses can maintain consumer trust and compliance with the law.

Learn About: