Last Updated: , 67 days ago.
Can a paralegal help me file a Small Claims Court claim in Ontario if I’m only seeking money or return of personal property?
Yes. PKM Legal Services helps Ontario clients understand Small Claims Court subject-matter jurisdiction under the Courts of Justice Act, including that the court can hear actions for the payment of money (up to the prescribed limit) or recovery of possession of personal property (within the prescribed value limit), and it must “hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact” for eligible matters (Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, ss. 23(1), 25). If your request is really for other orders (like an injunction, declaration, contract cancellation, or detailed accounting), the claim may not fit Small Claims Court powers, so a paralegal can help you assess the best next step and draft the right materials to support your claim. Call (519) 410-5250 to discuss your situation and get a plan for filing, evidence, and next steps.
Add this website to Google Preferred Sources
Litigative Subject-Matter Authority
The Small Claims Court is a specialized branch of the Superior Court of Justice that provides an accessible forum for resolving civil disputes involving relatively modest sums of money and certain specific types of claims. The Small Claims Court adjudicative subject-matter jurisdiction is defined by statute and regulation, setting clear boundaries on the kinds of disputes that may be heard.
Note: For immediate help, please contact PKM Legal Services by phone at: (519) 410-5250 to retain services or to discuss any specific questions that you may have.
The Law
The Small Claims Court can only deal with certain kinds of remedies. By law, its role is limited to cases that ask for either money (up to the monetary limit) or the return of personal property worth up to that limit. This means that if someone wants a different type of court order; such as a declaration of rights, an injunction to stop someone from doing something, the cancellation of a contract, or a detailed financial accounting, those kinds of requests are outside the powers of the Small Claims Court. On the other hand, if the claim fits within the money or property categories, the Small Claims Court can hear almost any kind of dispute, regardless of what the subject of the disagreement may be. The law specifically says that the Small Claims Court must decide all questions of fact and law that come up in such cases. In other words, as long as the remedy being asked for is money or the return of personal property within the financial limit, the Small Claims Court is directed to handle the case, regardless of whether the dispute arises from a contract, from negligence, or from any other cause of action (meaning reason for suing).
Jurisdiction
23 (1) The Small Claims Court,
(a) has jurisdiction in any action for the payment of money where the amount claimed does not exceed the prescribed amount exclusive of interest and costs; and
(b) has jurisdiction in any action for the recovery of possession of personal property where the value of the property does not exceed the prescribed amount.
...
Summary hearings
25 The Small Claims Court shall hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact and may make such order as is considered just and agreeable to good conscience.
The Ontario Court of Appeal, in Maple Ridge Community Management Ltd. v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 231, 2015 ONCA 520, highlighted the essential role of the Small Claims Court in promoting access to justice. While citing the Supreme Court decision in Hryniak v. Mauldin, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87, the Court of Appeal emphasized that access to justice is among the greatest challenges facing the Canadian legal system, with rising costs and delays threatening the rule of law. Building on that principle, the Court of Appeal observed that the Small Claims Court mandate per section 25 of the Courts of Justice Act to “hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact” serves a vital function by offering meaningful and cost-effective adjudication of disputes involving modest claims. The Small Claims Court, with simplified processes designed to handle a high volume of cases efficiently, thereby helps to ensure that individuals who might otherwise be unable to afford litigation can still pursue or defend their legal rights.
[33] The Supreme Court of Canada has recognized that access to justice is a significant and ongoing challenge to the justice system with the potential to threaten the rule of law. In Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87, at para. 1, the court held:
Ensuring access to justice is the greatest challenge to the rule of law in Canada today. Trials have become increasingly expensive and protracted. Most Canadians cannot afford to sue when they are wronged or defend themselves when they are sued, and cannot afford to go to trial. Without an effective and accessible means of enforcing rights, the rule of law is threatened. Without public adjudication of civil cases, the development of the common law is stunted.
[34] The Small Claims Court is mandated under s. 25 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, to “hear and determine in a summary way all questions of law and fact and may make such order as is considered just and agreeable to good conscience.” The Small Claims Court plays a vital role in the administration of justice in the province by ensuring meaningful and cost effective access to justice for cases involving relatively modest claims for damages. In order to meet its mandate, the Small Claims Court’s process and procedures are designed to ensure that it can handle a large volume of cases in an efficient and economical manner.
The Superior Court in Ontario Deputy Judges Association v. Ontario, 2005 CanLII 42263 indirectly highlighted just how many different kinds of cases can appear in the Small Claims Court. Although the ruling focused mainly on the duties of Deputy Judges, the Court observed that they may hear disputes involving Charter rights, defamation, creditor claims, intellectual property, estates, and even medical malpractice. The remedies remain limited, usually money or the return of personal property, but the case shows that Deputy Judges regularly face a wide range of legal issues. As the Court noted, the Small Claims Court is Ontario’s busiest court and often involves surprisingly complex cases, even within its financial limits.
[18] Deputy judges can hear a wide range of cases and have broad jurisdiction over proceedings involving the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, defamation, creditors' rights, intellectual property claims, estate litigation, and medical malpractice, among others. Deputy judges also exercise a form of equitable jurisdiction, which adds to their role and responsibilities as judicial officers. The Small Claims Court can hear and determine all questions of law and fact and may make orders considered just and agreeable to good conscience.
...
[20] Deputy judges carry out judicial functions for large numbers of litigants contesting significant sums of money. The Small Claims Court is the busiest court in Ontario and the court that citizens are most likely to encounter. Litigants in Small Claims Court are increasingly represented by counsel and contend with increasingly complex legal issues. ...
Conclusion
The subject-matter jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court is both limited and expansive. It is limited in the sense that only certain remedies; namely, the payment of money or the recovery of personal property within the prescribed threshold may be granted. Yet within those boundaries, the adjudicative jurisdiction is expansive, allowing a wide range of legal disputes across many causes of action. This balance reflects the statutory design: to provide a simplified, efficient, and cost-effective forum, for resolving disputes that might otherwise be inaccessible to many litigants. By doing so, the Small Claims Court fulfills an essential role in advancing access to justice while ensuring the rule of law is meaningfully available.
NOTE: A significant quantity of online searches utilising “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicate a demand for prompt and competent legal assistance, rather than a precise professional designation. In Ontario, licensed paralegals are governed by the same Law Society that regulates lawyers and can represent clients in specific legal proceedings. Advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural adeptness are fundamental to this role. PKM Legal Services provides legal representation within its licensed authority, focusing on strategic positioning, evidentiary preparation, and compelling advocacy with the goal of achieving effective and beneficial outcomes for clients.
